On ReadWriteWeb this morning, I read about the Hadopi law in France, which is a three strikes law. If you are accused of illegal downloads of music or files 3 times, your Internet access will be shut down. OMG! This is so Brave New Word or 1984. In order to prove your innocence–notice that you have to prove you are innocent, the French authorities have provided no place for them to try you for guilt, you have to buy and install tracking software (spyware) that records your every move on the Internet.
Now, apparently the French Constitutional Court has found the law unconstitutional. Great, but the Sarkozy government is seeking to reinstate tracking/censorship with LOPPSI under the guise of terrorism protection.
Red flags waving all around. Of course, the U.S. government can already install spyware on suspects’ computers. The FBI still needs a search warrant to install the spyware, so checks and balances are built into the system. As long as there are safeguards built into any spying system, I tend to view tracking criminals on the Internet as similar to tracking them pre-Internet. If you have enough evidence to obtain a search warrant, then the warrant should be valid on or off line. Police should be able to track down porn traffickers and terrorists online. However, if you start trying to enact laws that cut off a person’s Internet access pre-trial, then I really start to have problems with the law and constitutional rights.
How many more countries are going to follow the trend of blocking Internet access or Internet censorship, all based on the premise that this is for the better good? I don’t know, but I find blocking the Internet a frightening proposition.